KPA Lawyers | Melbourne


Corporate and Commercial Law

How We Can Help

After nearly 40 years of advising Melbourne business we have built an enviable network of advisors who can assist throughout your business growth.

Capital Markets and Capital Raisings

What we do

Banking and Finance

What we do

Venture Capital

What we do

Head Office Advisory

What we do

Corporate Governance

What we do

Commercial Contracts

What we do

Franchising

What we do

Unfair Contract Terms

What we do

Foreign Investment and Trade

What we do

Competition and Trade

What We do

Privacy and Data Protection

What We do

Shareholder and Unitholder Agreements

What We do

Frequently Asked Questions


In a business sale, the buyer purchases the assets that make up the business, rather than taking over the company that is running the business. These assets might include equipment, stock, intellectual property (including the business name), goodwill, selected contracts and, in most cases, employees.
The existing company remains with the seller, and only the agreed assets (and any specifically assumed liabilities) move to the buyer. This structure allows the buyer to choose which assets and rights they wish to acquire.

In a share sale, the buyer purchases the shares in the company that owns and operates the business. The company itself does not change, but its ownership does.
Because the company continues to trade, all of its assets, liabilities, employees and contracts remain within that company. The buyer effectively steps into the seller’s shoes as the new owner of the entity.

In a business sale:

  • Only specified business assets are transferred to the buyer.
  • Most historical debts and liabilities usually stay with the seller, unless the buyer agrees to assume them.
  • Employees generally need to be offered employment with the buyer’s entity, and their entitlements are managed as part of the transaction.  Some entitlements may be paid out upon the change of ownership, but certain entitlements (such as personal leave and long service leave) are carried across to the buyer.
  • Key contracts and leases often need to be assigned or novated and may require landlord or customer consent.

In a share sale:

  • Most contracts and leases stay in place because the contracting entity is the same, although consent from third parties may need to be sought in respect of the change of control that has occurredOnly specified business assets are transferred to the buyer.
  • The share in the company are transferred to the buyer.
  • The buyer takes on the company with all existing debts, obligations and trading history.
  • Employees remain employed by the same company, and so there is no payment of accrued entitlements.

The rules were updated to more effectively identify and prevent acquisitions that could harm competition, while allowing transactions that do not raise competition concerns to proceed as quickly as possible.

A proposed acquisition must be notified to the ACCC if it meets either of the following tests:

  • Test 1 — Large merged entity: The combined Australian revenue of the acquirer and target is at least $200 million; and either the Australian revenue of the target is at least $50 million, or the global transaction value is at least $250 million.
  • Test 2 — Very large acquirer: The Australian revenue of the acquirer is at least $500 million and the Australian revenue of the target is at least $10 million.

There are also rules that capture a series of smaller acquisitions by the same buyer over a three-year period, which can trigger notification even where no single deal meets the above thresholds on its own.

If notification is required, the process generally involves three stages:

  1. Phase 1 review — The ACCC conducts a preliminary review of the proposed acquisition and will either clear it to proceed or escalate it to a more detailed Phase 2 review.
  2. Phase 2 review — The ACCC undertakes a more in-depth assessment and will determine whether the acquisition may proceed or must not be completed.
  3. Public benefit application — If the ACCC determines that an acquisition must not proceed, the merger parties may apply for approval on public benefit grounds. The ACCC can still approve the acquisition if it is satisfied that the public benefits outweigh the likely detriment to competition.

What happens if you do not notify?

Many businesses use ESSs to attract and retain talented employees, align employee and shareholder interests, and reward staff without relying solely on cash bonuses. Employees can also share in the future growth and success of the business.


ESSs are recognised under Division 83A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) and can provide valuable tax concessions, particularly for eligible startup companies.

Depending on the structure of the scheme and the employee’s eligibility, tax on the discount received may be reduced, deferred, or, for eligible startup companies, potentially eliminated altogether under the startup concession rules.

The most common ESS tax concessions include:

  • a tax reduction of up to $1,000 for eligible employees under certain taxed-upfront schemes;
  • deferred taxation, allowing tax to be postponed until a later taxing point where statutory conditions are satisfied; or
  • generous startup concessions that can significantly reduce the tax payable on qualifying employee equity interests.

A whitewash commonly arises in debt-funded acquisitions where a lender requires the target company or its subsidiaries to guarantee the acquisition loan or grant security over their assets after completion. These arrangements are generally regarded as “financial assistance” and can trigger the restrictions in section 260A.

Section 260A prohibits a company from financially assisting a person to acquire shares in the company (or its holding company) unless one of three statutory exceptions applies:

  • the assistance does not materially prejudice the interests of the company, its shareholders or creditors;
  • the assistance is approved by shareholders under the whitewash procedure in section 260B; or
  • the assistance falls within a specific exemption in section 260C.

Financial assistance is interpreted broadly and can include:

  • the company guaranteeing a loan used to acquire its shares;
  • the company granting security over its assets to support acquisition finance;
  • the company lending money to the buyer; or
  • the company paying costs associated with the acquisition.

For example, a whitewash may be required where an employee or manager wishes to buy shares in the business and the company guarantees or supports the loan used to fund that purchase.

If there is doubt as to whether the transaction will qualify as “financial assistance” courts will look to the commercial substance of the transaction rather than its legal form.

A whitewash under section 260B typically requires:

  • shareholder approval by special resolution or unanimous shareholder consent;
  • disclosure of all information material to shareholders’ voting decisions;
  • ASIC lodgements and notice requirements; and
  • compliance with statutory waiting periods before the assistance can be provided.

In acquisition transactions, the whitewash is commonly completed after settlement, once the buyer has acquired control of the target company.

Why KPA Lawyers for Commercial Law

KPA Lawyers | Melbourne
KPA Lawyers | Melbourne
KPA Lawyers | Melbourne
KPA Lawyers | Melbourne

Client Stories

What our clients say

After a difficult family separation, KPA handled every aspect of my matter with real sensitivity and skill. They took the time to understand what mattered most to me and delivered an outcome I am truly grateful for.

Michelle K.Family law, Mornington Peninsula

Firstly, I wanted to say that our team at Invescasa has been very impressed with the support and service you have provided thus far. As our business grows, we seek to partner with highly experienced conveyancing professionals who can help us deliver exceptional service, advice, and outcomes for our clients. We believe you could be a valuable part of that process

CEO, InvescasaProperty Law

We used KPA for our property settlement and could not be happier.The team were professional and efficient, and genuinely cared about our outcome every step of the way.

Sarah & Mark T.Property settlement, Sandringham

The KPA team guided us through a complex commercial lease negotiation with genuine confidence and expertise. I would highly recommend them to any business looking for reliable,knowledgeable legal support.

James L.Commercial leasing, Melbourne CBD

Our Team

The CORPORATE AND COMMERCIAL LAW TEAM

Erin Varker

PARTNER

Erin heads KPA Lawyers' Commercial division and has been with the firm since her admission to practice. She...

Zaid Mohseni

SPECIAL COUNSEL

Zaid has advised private, corporate and government clients on a wide range of transactions including corporate restructuring, fundraising,...

Nancy D’Arcy

ASSOCIATE

Nancy is a commercial lawyer who works closely with clients to help them complete transactions efficiently and with...